Archive for April, 2010

Picked these up at salute from The DiceShop.


I went, I queued, I shopped, I chatted to a few people, I took some rather poor photographs:

Once the house move is out of the way, I need to spend a good amount of time practising photography, especially flash photography.


  • Doctor Who: best episode of the season so far. (I've watched it twice already! Which is rather tragic…) #fb #
  • Sunshine, Salute, a pint of beer, Doctor Who about to start. Perfect day. #fb #
  • Now I've spent "some" money. That's more like it. Starships from GZG and Sci-Fi lookalikes ;-) from @Heresy_Andy. #Salute2010 #
  • Viking Warrior eating noodles with chopsticks getting funny looks from marathon runners #Salute2010 #
  • Two hours and nothing purchased … Whats wrong with me? #Salute2010 #
  • The Q Buster Queue is longer than ever! #Salute2010 #
  • #UnexpectedNostalgia The Royal Tournament. #
  • Mandelson comes to Clegg's defence? That's just a machiavellian way to shaft him, isn't it? #fb #
  • New level of lazy: person got into the lift w/ me, not only going just 1 floor, but they asked me to press the button for them. #fb #
  • The Conservatives are promoting themselves as the party of change. No place for the dictionary in this election? #fb #
  Comments Off

  • Getting really fed up up Blip.FM spam – got the "weekly" update five or six times this week despite unsubscribing several times. #
  • I'm sitting next to someone who prefers the remake of The Wicker Man to the original and is willing to admit it in public! :-o #fb #
  • Only 10 days to go until Salute. I'd better start writing my shopping list. #fb #
  • What a day. Need food (and, hmm, maybe, some beer) now. #fb #
  Comments Off

I always enjoy Peter-Paul Koch’s blog posts even though currently I’m only on the very distant edge of the mobile world (as a user I use my phone for making the occasional phone call and nothing much else, as a developer I’m dipping my toes in the world of mobile web and couldn’t care less about apps). Today’s seems to sum up the situation with Apple perfectly:

Is it a good idea for Apple to go to war against several major players and piss off developers all at the same time?


  • Playing with the new open data from the ordnance survey. Lots of lovely data and maps make for a very happy geek. #fb #
  • Well, Yes. Obviously, it's just a number. #
  • Just fixed an error and discovered 666 items in the log files folder. Coincidence? #
  Comments Off

  • Doctor Who – By and large I'm with the crowd. Didn't like the new theme. Neutral on Karen Gillan. Liked the new Tardis and Matt Smith. #fb #
  • <gritted-teeth>Well done Cambridge</gritted-teeth> #boatrace #fb #
  • Played the @hunch twitter predictor game at http://hunch.com/games/twitter-predictor — it guessed right 91% #
  Comments Off

This week I converted a site from XHTML 1 to HTML5, and as part of this I moved the ARIA landmark role attributes from generic div elements to various new elements. And I got to wondering whether this could have unforeseen consequences.

I know from feedback that the ARIA landmark roles have proved useful for some users of this site, so it would be a bad move if this stopped working because their screen readers didn’t recognise the role attributes on “unknown” elements.

<div role="banner"> vs <header role="banner">

I guess what this boils down to, are there any user agents that (a) support the role attribute and (b) use the DOM as generated by a browser engine that fails to recognise HTML5 elements?

Firefox 2 and Internet Explorer won’t style HTML5 elements (though IE will after applying a little JavaScript magic) but styling isn’t the same as recognised at a basic level.

This seems like an edge case, as most of the reports I’ve found whilst searching have indicated that HTML5+ARIA is a good thing and works, but most of the reports don’t specify versions of user agents used. Does anyone have any links to first hand research into this issue?

Very True Mood: (curious) curious

Megaminis – Andrewsarchus, Megalonychidae, and Smilodon @ £11.18

Total: £11.18

Total for the quarter: £20.42 + £5.99 + £11.18 = £37.59

Tags: